Kalibrasi Persamaan Thornthwaite Dan Evaporasi Panci Untuk Memprediksi Evapotranspirasi Potensial Pada Daerah Dengan Data Cuaca Terbatas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29303/jstl.v6i1.155Keywords:
correction number, FAO-penman monteith, potential evapotranspirationAbstract
Determination of irrigation channel dimensions is determined by the number of consumptive use values that are empirically determined by the potential evapotranspiration value (ETo). Due to the limited lysimeter measurement data, the ETo value is usually approached by an empirical method using weather data input. The recognized standard method for its reliability and can be used universally in determining ETo values is the FAO Penman-Monteith method. However, the use of this method is only possible if complete weather data is available. This study modified the simplest ETo calculation method, the Thornthwaite method and the evaporation pan method to obtain ETo values as accurate as FAO PM resulted. Callibrations are made by finding the correction number to get the best results shown by the high of correlation number and the efficiency index value. The results obtained are for the area with limited weather data condition, the Thornthwaite method both before and after calibration has better accuracy than the evaporation pan method. While the calibration carried out successfully increased the correlation number and efficiency index of both methods significantly. The results of the two calibrated methods, the Thornthwaite method provides better and satisfactory performance with a ratio between 0.86 and 0.89 and the efficiency index reaches 0.78.References
Allen, G.R., L.S. Pereira, D. Raes, M. Smith, 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration - Guidelines for computing crop water requirements - FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56, FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Asdak, Chay. 1995. Hidrologi Dan Pengelolaan Daerah Aliran Sungai. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Bautista, F., D. Bautista, C. Delgado, 2009. Calibration of The Equations of Hargreaves And Thornthwaite To Estimate the Potential Evapotranspiration in Semi–Arid and Subhumid Tropical Climates for Regional Applications, Atmósfera, vol.22, no.4, México.
BISDA NTB, 2014. Koefisien Evaporasi Panci A Dalam Menentukan Evapotranspirasi Rujukan Pada 5 Pos Klimatologi Di Pulau Lombok, Booklet Informasi Sumber Daya Air. Vol. 2. No. 1
Chiew, F.H.S., N.N. Kamaladasa, H.M. Malano, T.A. McMahon, 1995. Penman-Monteith, FAO-24 Reference Crop Evapotranspiration and Class-A Pan Data in Australia, Agricultural Water Management 28, 9-21
Chen, D., G. Gao, C.Y. Xu, J. Guo, R. Ren, 2005, Comparison of The Thornthwaite Method and Pan Data with The Standard Penman-Monteith Estimates of Reference Evapotranspiration in China, Climate Research, Vol. 28: 123–132
Grismer, M.E., M. Orang, R. Snyder, R. Matyac, 2002. Pan Evaporation to Reference Evapotranspiration Conversion Methods, J. Irrig. Drain Eng., 28:180-184.
Hadiswara, E.P. 2015. Analisis Perbandingan Beberapa Metode Evapotranspirasi Pada Daerah Karakteristik Basah Dan Karakteristik Kering di Pulau Lombok, Skripsi, Universitas Mataram
Hargreaves, G.H., F. ASCE, R.G. Allen, 2003. History and Evaluation of Hargreaves Evapotranspiration Equation, J. Irrig. Drain Eng., 129:53-63
Harto, Sri. 1993. Analisis Hidrologi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Kumar, K.K., K.R. Kumar, and P.R. Rakhecha, 1987. Comparison of Penman and Thornthwaite Methods of Estimating Potential Evapotranspiration for Indian Conditions, Theor. Appl. Climatol. 38, 140-146
Lakatos, M., T. Weidinger, L. Hoffmann, Z. Bihari, A. Horváth, (2020). Computation of daily Penman–Monteith reference evapotranspiration in the Carpathian Region and comparison with Thornthwaite estimates, Adv. Sci. Res., 16, 251–259, 2020
Popova, Z., M. Kercheva, L.S. Pereira, 2006. Validation of The Fao Methodology for Computing Eto With Limited Data. Application to South Bulgaria, Irrig. And Drain. 55: 201–215
McCuen, R.H., Z. Knight, and A.G. Cutter, 2006. Evaluation of the Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency Index, J. Hydrol. Eng.11:597-602
Mulyani, Anny., D. Nursyamsi, I. Las, 2014. Percepatan Pengembangan Pertanian Lahan Kering Iklim Kering di Nusa Tenggara, Balai Besar Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sumberdaya Lahan Pertanian, Bogor.
Raghuwanshi, N.S., and W.W. Wallende, 1998. Converting from Pan Evaporation to Evapotranspiration, J. Irrig. Drain Eng. 124:275-277
Sentelhas, P.C., T.J. Gillespie. E.A. Santos, 2010. Evaluation of FAO Penman–Monteith and alternative methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration with missing data in Southern Ontario, Agricultural Water Management 97, 635–644
Sepaskhah, A.R., and F. Razzaghi, 2009. Evaluation of the adjusted Thornthwaite and Hargreaves-Samani methods for estimation of daily evapotranspiration in a semi-arid region of Iran, Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science Vol. 55, No. 1, 51–66
Smith, M., R. Allen, J.L Monteith, A. Perrier, L. Santos Pereira, and A. Segeren, 1992. Expert Consultation on Revision of FAO Methodologies for Crop Water Requirements. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (Land and Water Development Division), Rome, 60 pp.
Soemarto, C.D. 1986. Hidrologi Teknik. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional
Sumner, D.M. and J.M. Jacobs, 2005. Utility of Penman–Monteith, Priestley–Taylor, reference evapotranspiration, and pan evaporation methods to estimate pasture evapotranspiration, Journal of Hydrology 308, 81–104
Triatmodjo, B., 2008. Hidrologi Terapan. Yogyakarta: Beta Offset
1.png)
