Evaluasi Kualitas Spermatozoa Ayam Brahma, Cochin dan Bangkok Sebagai Dasar Penerapan Teknologi Inseminasi Buatan pada Ayam Kampung
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29303/jstl.v0i0.250Keywords:
insemination, Brahma chicken, Cochin, BangkokAbstract
Research on the evaluation of the spermatozoa quality of Brahma, Cochin and Bangkok chickens as the basis for the application of artificial insemination technology in native chickens has been carried out. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the spermatozoa quality of Brahma, Cochin and Bangkok rooster as the basis for determining the spermatozoa dose for artificial insemination in local chickens. method research was used a completely randomized design (CRD) with three treatments, that is: Brahma, Cochin and Bangkok rooster. Each treatment was repeated five times. Cement storage is carried out by inserting an artificial vagina into the cloaca of the rooster and stimulating it to climb the hen. The collected sperm were analyzed at the Animal Reproduction Laboratory, Faculty of Animal Science, Mataram University. The variables observed included motility, viability and morphology of spermatozoa. The results of studied that the spermatozoa motility of Brahma, Chicin and Bangkok rooster were 72 ± 2.74%. 74 ± 2.24% and 73 ± 2.74% (P> 0.05) respectively; The spermatozoan viability of Brahma rooster and Bangkok rooster was 99.2 ± 1.30%, 99.4 ± 0.55% and 99.2 ± 1.10% (P>0.05)respectively. The spermatozoan morphology of brahma rooster, chicin rooster and Bangkok rooster was 94.6 ± 2.30%, 94.4 ± 2.70% and 97.4 ± 2.07% (P> 0.05), respectively. Cochin rooster and Bangkok rooster respectively, 62.6 ± 7.92 x 107, 57 ± 5.83 x107 , and 65.2 ± 12.28 x107, respectively. The results of the study concluded that Brahma, Cochin and Bangkok rooster had good sperm quality and could be able to used in artificial insemination of Kampung hens.References
Alkan S, Baran A, Ozdas B, Evecen M. 2002.Morphological defects in turkey semen. Turk J.Vet Anim Sci. 26: 1087-1092
Arifiantini RI. 2012. Teknik Koleksi dan Evaluasi Semen pada Hewan. Bogor (ID): IPB Press.
Ax RL, M Dally, BA Didion, RW Lenz, CC Love, DD Varner, B Hafez and ME Bellin. 2000. Semen evaluation. In: Hafez B and ESE Hafez. 2000. Reproduction in Farm Animals. 7th ed. Philadelphia (US): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 365-389.
Asnawi, 1997. Kinerja fisiologis persilangan ayam pedaging dengan ayam kampong., Thesis Pasca Sarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.
Donoghue AM, Wishart G.J. 2000. Storage of poultry semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 62: 213-232.
Dradjat AS, Lukman HY dan Sumadiasa IWL. 2018. Motilitas spermatozoa ayam pada penyimpanan dingin dengan pengencer tris, citrate, kuning telur, filtrat jambu biji (Psidium guayava) dan buah tin (Fikus karika rob). Abstrak seminar Nasional Saintek 2018. Plaza Hotel Lombok 27 Oktober 2018;21
Elagib HAA, NA Musharaf, SA Makawi and HE Mohamed. 2012. The effects of age and season on semen characteristics of White Leghorn Roosters under Sudan conditions. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 11 (1): 47-49.
Gilbert, A. B. 1980. Poultry. In: E.S.E. Hafez (Ed). Reproduction in farm animals. 4th Ed. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia. pp 423-446.
MKPUGHE, J.I. Feanyi and Bratte, 2015. Lawrence Effects of Breed and Frequency of Ejaculation on Semen Characteristics of Chickens. International Journal of Livestock Research. Vol 5(4) : 42-50
Hambu E.K., R.I. Arifiantini, B. Purwantara and S. Darwati, 2016. Raw Semen Characteristics of Three Different Indonesian Local Roosters. Animal Production. 18(3):165-172, DGHE No. 81/DIKTI/Kep./2011.
Hafez, E.S.E. 1993. In: Reproduction in Farm Animals. E6th ed. Lea & Febiger,
Philadelphia
Hermiz. H.N., Ahmed S., Shaker, Basheer M.A, Hasafa, Tahir R., Al-Khatib, Sardar Y. S., Jamil S. Toma. 2016. Evaluation Semen Characterization of Roosters Resulted from Different Local Lines and Their Crosses with ISA Brown. International Journal of Agricultural Science. 1: 1 – 8.
Hijriyanto M., Dasrul dan Cut Nila Thasm. 2017. Pengaruh frekwensi penampungan semen terhadap kualitas spermatozoa pada ayam Bangkok. JIMVET. 01(1):046-053
Hrnčár C., L. Barborová1, J. Bujko. The Quality of Ejaculate in Cocks of Brown Leghorn, Oravka and Brahma Breeds. Animal Science and Biotechnologies. 46 (2)
Jarinkovičová, L., Máchal, L., Máchal, J., Filipčík, R., Tůmová, E., Horský, R. Relationship of ejaculate quality and selected biochemical parameters of blood in cockerels of three laying lines, Czech Journal of Animal Science, 2012, 57(8), 370-376
Lubis M.T., 2011. Motilitas Spermatozoa Ayam Kampung dalam Pengencer Air Kelapa, NaCl Fisiologis dan Air Kelapa-NaCl Fisiologis pada 25-29°C. Agripet : Vol (11) No. 2: 45-50
Máchal, L., Jankowski, J. 2002. Relationship between semen parameters, fertility and hatchability of eggs in five original laying strains of hens, Polish Journal of Natural Sciences, 2002, 10, 116-121
Malik A, Haron AW, Yusoff R, Nesa M, Bukar M, Kasim A. 2013. Evaluation of the ejaculate quality of the red jungle fowl, domestic chicken, and bantam chicken in Malaysia. TurkJ Vet Anim Sci. 37:564-568.
North, M.O. and D.D. Bell. 1990. Commercial Chicken Production Manual. 3rd Ed. Van Mostand Reinhold. New York.
Nugroho A.P dan D.M. Saleh. 2016. Motilitas dan Abnormalitas Spermatozoa Ayam Kampung dengan Pengencer Ringer Laktat - Putih Telur dan Lama Simpan pada Suhu 5oC selama 48 Jam. http://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/ actavetindones/article/view
Parkhurst, C.R dan Mountney, G.J. 1987. Poultry Meat and Egg Production. AnAVI Book. Published by Van Nostrand Reinhold. New York.
Saleh D. M, Sigit Mugiyono, dan Moch. Mufti. 2017. Pengaruh Frekwensi Penyadapan Semen terhadap Kualitas Spermatozoa pada Ayam Sentul. Prosiding Seminar Nasional”Pengembangan Sumber Daya Perdesaan dan Kearifan Lokal Berkelanjutan VII”17- 18 November Purwokerto.
Selvan ST. 2007. Influence of dietary protein, calcium and vitamin-E on the semen quality in broiler breeder males. Tamilnadu J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 3 (2): 60-64.
Siudzińska, A., Lukaszewicz, E. 2018. The effect of breed on freezability of semen of fancy fowl, Animal Science Papers and Reports, 2008, 26, 331-340
Setiadi, D.R., H. Hasibuan, R. Indriastuti, A. Atul Arif, Z.N. A. Rosyada, R I. Arifiantini, C. Sumantri. 2019. Karakteristik seemen Ayam IPB-D. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/ipthp/article/view/26575/ 17156.
Sonseeda P., T. Vongpralub, B. Laopaiboon. 2013. Effects of Environmental Factors, Ages and Breeds on Semen Characteristics in Thai Indigenous Chickens: A One-year Study. Thai J Vet Med. 2013. 43(3): 347-352
Tarif AM, MMU Bhuiyan, RN Ferdousy, NS Juyena and B R Mollah. 2013. Evaluation of semen quality among four roosters lines. J. of Agriculture and Vet. Sci (IOSR-JAVS). 6 (5): 7-13.
Tesfay H.H., Yanyan Sun, Yunlei Li, Lei Shi, Jing Fan, Panlin Wang, Yunhe Zong, Aixin Ni, Hui Ma, Adamu Isa Mani, and Jilan Chen. 2020. Comparative studies of semen quality traits and sperm kinematic parameters in relation to fertility rate between 2 genetic groups of breed lines. Article in Press. Poultry Science
1.png)
