Daya Gabung Beberapa Varietas Padi (Oryza sativa L.) pada Persilangan Dialel Menggunakan Metode Griffing II

Authors

  • Anak Agung Ketut Sudharmawan Agroekoteknologi/Budidaya Pertanian, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Mataram
  • Baiq Erna Listiana Agroekoteknologi/Budidaya Pertanian, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Mataram
  • Sofi Rianti Agroekoteknologi/Budidaya Pertanian, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29303/jstl.v0i0.257

Keywords:

elder, F1, phenotype, genotype

Abstract

Diallel crossing is a method that is widely used to determine the ability to combine each individual so that it can identify the potential elders to be used in crossbreeding programs to assemble high yielding varieties. This experiment aims to determine the combining power of dialelic crosses of several varieties of rice using the Griffing II method, carried out in the experimental field of the Faculty of Agriculture, Mataram University in Nyiur Lembang Village, Narmada District, West Lombok Regency, from February to July 2019. This experiment uses the method experiments carried out in the field. The materials used in this experiment were four parents, namely IPB 3S variety, Situ Patenggang variety, Inpari 32 and G11 strain and the phenotype of the cross between the four parents. The experimental results showed that the effects of general affinity and special affinity for all observed characters (plant height, number of productive tillers, number of non-productive tillers, panicle length, number of filled grain, number of empty grain and weight of 100 grains) were significantly different, except on the effect of general affinity for the number of non-productive tillers showed no significant difference. The results of the combined power analysis of the four elders were positive, so it can be said that the four elders would get good results when crossed with a number of other genotypes.

References

Anhar, R., H. Erita dan Efendi. 2016. Pengaruh Dosis Pupuk Urea Terhadap Pertumbuhan dan Produksi Plasma Nutfah Padi Lokal Asal Aceh. Jurnal Kawista. 1(1); 30-36

Arraudeau MA., Vergara BS. 1992. Pedoma Budidaya Padi Gogo. Gani A, Zaini Z, Hamzah Z, penerjemah; Bogor (ID): Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Balai Penelitian Tanaman Pangan Sukarami. Terjemahan dati : A Farmer’s Primer on Growiing Rice

Aswidinnor H, Willy B. Suwarno, Desta Wirnas, Yudiwanti We Kusumo. 2016. Teknologi Produksi Optimum (IPB-Prima) Padi Varietas IPB 3S dan IPB 4S. Departemen Agronomi Dan Hortikultura. Fakultas Pertanian. Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Badan Litbang Pertanian. 2007. PetunjukTeknis Lapang Pengelolaan Tanaman Terpadu (PTT) Padi Sawah Irigasi. Departemen Pertanian. Jakarta.

Badan Pusat Statistik. 2016. Produksi Padi Menurut Provinsi (Ton) 1993-2015. http://www.bps.go.id/linkTabelkDinamis/view/id/865 [20februari 2018/

Chang, T.T. 1988. The ethnobotany of rice in island Southeast Asia. Asian Perspectives 26(1):69–76.

Chapman and Hall. 1985. The Science of Animal that Serve Humanity. 3th Edition. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. New York

De Datta SK. 1981. Principle and Practice of Rice Production. New York (US): Jhon Willey and Son.

Fatimaturrohmah S.,m Indarastuti A.R., Sogianto A., dan Damnhuri. 2016. Uji Daya Hasil Lanjutan Berapa Genotipe Padi (Oryza Sativa L.) Hibrida di Dataran Medium. Produksi Tanaman. 4 (2) : 129-136

Griffing, B. 1956. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing system. Aust. J. Biol. Sci.9(4): 463- 493

Hajoeningtijas, O.D., dan Agus Mulyanti Purnawanto. 2013. Keragaman Padi Gogo Lokal di Kabupaten Banyumas Jawa Tengah. Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Purwokerto. Agritech: Vol. XV No. 2 2013.

Herawati W. D. 2012. Budidaya Padi. Javalitera. Yogyakarta.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-29